|
Paper投稿成功只是第一步,，膽戰(zhàn)心驚的等上兩三個月,，收到期刊Editor的回信,。回信不外乎三種情況：直接拒稿（Reject), 修改（Revision）和接收（Accept),。只有極少數(shù)作者享受過直接被Accept的喜悅,。 Revision是一種更常見且對論文最終發(fā)表有益的結(jié)果。Revision大致可以分為三種情形：小修（Minor Revision）,、大修（Major Revision）和拒稿再投（Reject and resubmit）,。 如何有策略的回復(fù)審稿人非常重要，優(yōu)秀的回復(fù)是論文接收的保障,，不恰當(dāng)?shù)幕貜?fù)會延緩甚至導(dǎo)致文章拒稿,。此文為大家策一策，如何有禮有節(jié)進(jìn)退自如的寫一篇Response Letter,！ 和Reviewer發(fā)生爭執(zhí)是非常不明智的,，也是非常不理智的。如果審稿人提出的意見正確自然不用說,，如果提出的意見存在問題,，也無需在回復(fù)信中冷嘲熱諷。避免出現(xiàn)：We totally disagree....或 The referee obviously does not know this field一類的話,，建議采用：“We agree with you that...., however, ......”的句式,。 Response Letter中在逐條回復(fù)審稿人之前，先總體回復(fù)下,，感謝Reviewers審閱稿件花費的時間和精力,，同時說明你已閱讀審稿意見，并對文章進(jìn)行了認(rèn)真的修改。方便期刊編輯和Reviewers重新閱讀你的稿件,。在這分享一則模板： Response Letter Dear Dr/ Prof 主編姓名（Editor in chief or Editor who issued the decision letter,，寫上負(fù)責(zé)你文章編輯的姓名，顯得尊重),， Thank you for your letter and your comments. Those comments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper. We have revised the manuscript, and would like to resubmit it for your consideration. We have addressed the comments raised by the reviewers, and two versions of the revised manuscript (changes tracked and cleaned) for your further assessment. Point-to point responses to the reviewers’ comments are listed clearly in this letter. The revised manuscript has been edited by Elsevier language editing service.（如果審稿意見提出paper需要潤色，需要加上此句） We hope that the revised manuscript is now acceptable for publication in your journal. Thank you again for your consideration. Best Regards, Correspondence（通訊作者姓名） 科室（學(xué)院） 地址 E-mail: XXX 當(dāng)Reviewer給出較多審稿意見時,，Argue是難免的,。在Argue時，一定是建立在分析審稿人意見后,，列出相應(yīng)結(jié)果的基礎(chǔ)上,，可以加一些參考文獻(xiàn)作為佐證。對于觀點的Argue,，需要引證足夠的,，權(quán)威代表的文獻(xiàn)，有條理的闡述,，并按照正文參考文獻(xiàn)格式規(guī)范,。舉個栗子： Question: What is the basis of the lysozyme as a biomaker? Reply: Thanks for the question. We described the basis or reasons for choosing lysozyme as a biomarker in this study. The detailed information and related references are clearly list in the revised manuscript. 對于Reviewer提出的修改意見，需要逐條回復(fù)意見（Point-to point response), 并注明修改的內(nèi)容文字,，在原稿件中的哪一頁哪幾行,。舉個栗子： Question: The reference #12 is missing from the Introduction but used much later in the paper. Should these be in order used in the manuscript? Reply: Thank you for your comment. The missing reference has been added in the revised manuscript. Please refer to page xxx. 逐條回復(fù)審稿意見會讓審稿人看的清晰，給Reviewer提供方便,。此外,，Reviewer提出的審稿意見問題，不論大小,，都要全面回復(fù),。 首先，應(yīng)該對審稿人的意見表示贊同：We agree that more study would be useful to understand details of interaction and enhancement. 然后,，應(yīng)該對實際情況進(jìn)行說明：At this point we do not have the necessary tool-set to study the structure/interaction in the proposed amorphous bimetallic (hydrated) oxide. 請注意,，這里僅針對確實沒有辦法獲得相關(guān)實驗結(jié)果的情況，如果有可能,，審稿人提出需要補(bǔ)充實驗,，一定按照審稿人的要求進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。 進(jìn)一步表明態(tài)度,，指出哪些方法可能可以解決審稿人提出的問題,，并表示后期會進(jìn)行相關(guān)研究：We hope, in the future, to employ synchrotron X-ray techniques to determine the local coordination of Fe in the putative mixed Au-Fe oxide phase. This study is beyond the scope of this report which focuses> 實驗上暫時無法提供數(shù)據(jù)來回答審稿人的問題，就一定需要從文獻(xiàn)中找到依據(jù)來說明： We note also that since submission of our manuscript there has been apublication by Alex Bell and Martin Head-Gordon at Berkeley showing that Fe> 對于SCI如果是Major Revision（大修）,，很多雜志會給出2個月的修稿時間,，論文修回后還需送到之前的審稿人手里，重新進(jìn)行“Under Review”步驟。建議作者認(rèn)真處理審稿人的意見,，千萬不能掉以輕心,，大修后被拒的情況常有發(fā)生。一般Major revision的稿件建議修改時間不少于3-4周將稿件修回,。而對于Minor Revision的稿件,，意見只有寥寥數(shù)行，很多作者一天或幾天就修改完成,。對于修好的稿件建議稍微放一放,，多檢查幾遍有無語法錯誤等細(xì)節(jié)性的小問題。太快返回修改稿會讓編輯大大覺得你敷衍了事哦,！ |
|
|
