對Linux-Android系統(tǒng)的啟動(dòng)做了一些分析,下面的一篇文章側(cè)重講述Linux啟動(dòng)過程中函數(shù)Start_kernel()被調(diào)用之前的一些分
析,,同時(shí)也對函數(shù)Start_kernel()之后的代碼流程作了概述,,我希望關(guān)于Linux-Android系統(tǒng)的啟動(dòng)的專題能夠繼續(xù)地寫下去,,哈哈。
如果有不正確或者不完善的地方,,歡迎前來拍磚留言或者發(fā)郵件到 [email protected] 進(jìn)
行討論,,現(xiàn)行謝過。
一. 內(nèi)核自引導(dǎo)程序
1. 內(nèi)核zimage自解壓
這部分代碼在arch/${arch}/boot/compressed/head.S中,,該文件的代碼在zimage的生成過程中,,將會(huì)被打包
到zimage中。
head.S會(huì)首先初始化自解壓相關(guān)的如內(nèi)存等環(huán)境,,接下來就去調(diào)用decompress_kernel去解壓,,并調(diào)用
call_kernel函數(shù)去啟動(dòng)vmlinux。
去下面僅僅列舉一下head.S文件中最重要的部分:
----------------------------------------------------------------
/*
*
We're not in danger of overwriting ourselves. Do this the simple way.
*
*
r4 = kernel execution address
* r7 = architecture ID
*/
wont_overwrite: mov r0,
r4
mov r3, r7
bl decompress_kernel
b call_kernel
...
call_kernel: bl cache_clean_flush
bl cache_off
mov r0,
#0 @ must be zero
mov r1, r7 @ restore architecture number
mov r2,
r8 @ restore atags pointer
mov pc, r4 @ call kernel
----------------------------------------------------------------
其
中函數(shù)decompress_kernel在arch/${arch}/boot/compressed/misc.c中實(shí)現(xiàn),,功能就是完成zimage
鏡像的自解壓,,顯然該自解壓的過程需
要配置相應(yīng)的解壓地址等,這部分代碼如下:
----------------------------------------------------------------
ulg
decompress_kernel(ulg
output_start, ulg free_mem_ptr_p, ulg free_mem_ptr_end_p,
int
arch_id)
{
output_data = (uch *)output_start; /* Points to
kernel start */
free_mem_ptr = free_mem_ptr_p; /*
顯然,,這個(gè)地址是從通過寄存器傳進(jìn)來的 */
free_mem_end_ptr = free_mem_ptr_end_p;
__machine_arch_type =
arch_id;
arch_decomp_setup();
makecrc();
putstr("Uncompressing Linux...");
gunzip();
putstr("
done, booting the kernel.\n");
return output_ptr;
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
調(diào)
用call_kernel后首先關(guān)閉cache,,然后就跳轉(zhuǎn)到vmlinux入口去執(zhí)行并將系統(tǒng)的控制權(quán)交給了vmlinux。
2. 內(nèi)核vmlinux入口
>> vmlinux的編譯簡單描述
因?yàn)檫@里會(huì)牽扯到兩個(gè)文件head.S和head-nommu.S,所以下面簡單的描述
一下vmlinux的生成過程,。來看一下\arch\${arch}\kernel\makefile
,,在該文件的最后腳本如下:
----------------------------------------------------------------
#
#
Makefile for the linux kernel.
#
AFLAGS_head.o := -DTEXT_OFFSET=$(TEXT_OFFSET)
ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
CFLAGS_REMOVE_ftrace.o = -pg
endif
# Object file lists.
obj-y := compat.o elf.o entry-armv.o entry-common.o irq.o \
process.o ptrace.o setup.o signal.o \
sys_arm.o stacktrace.o
time.o traps.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ISA_DMA_API) += dma.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACORN) +=
ecard.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FIQ) += fiq.o
obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) +=
armksyms.o module.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARTHUR) += arthur.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ISA_DMA) +=
dma-isa.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += bios32.o isa.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) +=
smp.o
obj-$(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE) += ftrace.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KEXEC) +=
machine_kexec.o relocate_kernel.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) +=
kprobes.o kprobes-decode.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ATAGS_PROC) += atags.o
obj-$(CONFIG_OABI_COMPAT) +=
sys_oabi-compat.o
obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_THUMBEE) += thumbee.o
obj-$(CONFIG_KGDB) +=
kgdb.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CRUNCH) += crunch.o crunch-bits.o
AFLAGS_crunch-bits.o :=
-Wa,-mcpu=ep9312
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSCALE) += xscale-cp0.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_XSC3) +=
xscale-cp0.o
obj-$(CONFIG_IWMMXT) += iwmmxt.o
AFLAGS_iwmmxt.o :=
-Wa,-mcpu=iwmmxt
ifneq ($(CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110),y)
obj-y += io.o
endif
head-y := head$(MMUEXT).o
obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_LL) += debug.o
extra-y := $(head-y) init_task.o vmlinux.lds
----------------------------------------------------------------
可
以看到,文件的結(jié)束位置有一行代碼“head-y :=
head$(MMUEXT).o”,,其中MMUEXT在\arch\${arch}\makefile中
定義,,實(shí)際上對于沒有mmu的處理器,MMUEXT就是nommu,,而對于包含mmu的處理器,,它的值是空,,參照MMUEXT在\arch
\${arch}\makefile中的相關(guān)代碼
如下:
----------------------------------------------------------------
#
defines filename extension depending memory manement type.
ifeq
($(CONFIG_MMU),)
MMUEXT := -nommu
endif
----------------------------------------------------------------
所
以對于諸如S3C6410之類的包含MMU的處理器,,實(shí)際上最終vmlinux開始位置的代碼就是\arch\${arch}\kernel
\head.S.
>> head.S文件的分析
需要注意的是,對于該文件的描述,,一般的書籍上可能是僅僅對老版本的linux系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行了分
析,,就是說該文件結(jié)束位置直接調(diào)用了
start_kernel 函數(shù),至此開始執(zhí)行c代碼,。其實(shí),,并不是這樣的。
下面簡單的列寫一下head.S的內(nèi)容:
----------------------------------------------------------------/*
*
Kernel startup entry point.
* ---------------------------
*
*
This is normally called from the decompressor code. The requirements
*
are: MMU = off, D-cache = off, I-cache = dont care, r0 = 0,
* r1 =
machine nr, r2 = atags pointer.
*
* This code is mostly position
independent, so if you link the kernel at
* 0xc0008000, you call
this at __pa(0xc0008000).
*
* See
linux/arch/arm/tools/mach-types for the complete list of machine
*
numbers for r1.
*
* We're trying to keep crap to a minimum; DO
NOT add any machine specific
* crap here - that's what the boot
loader (or in extreme, well justified
* circumstances, zImage) is
for.
*/
.section ".text.head", "ax"
ENTRY(stext)
msr cpsr_c,
#PSR_F_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | SVC_MODE @ ensure svc mode
@ and irqs
disabled
mrc p15, 0, r9, c0, c0 @ get processor id
bl __lookup_processor_type @
r5=procinfo r9=cpuid
movs r10, r5 @ invalid processor (r5=0)?
beq __error_p @
yes, error 'p'
bl __lookup_machine_type @ r5=machinfo
movs r8,
r5 @ invalid machine (r5=0)?
beq __error_a @ yes, error 'a'
bl __vet_atags
bl __create_page_tables
/*
* The following calls CPU specific code in a position
independent
* manner. See arch/arm/mm/proc-*.S for details. r10 =
base of
* xxx_proc_info structure selected by
__lookup_machine_type
* above. On return, the CPU will be ready
for the MMU to be
* turned on, and r0 will hold the CPU control
register value.
*/
ldr r13, __switch_data @ address to jump to
after
@ mmu has been enabled
adr lr, __enable_mmu @
return (PIC) address
add pc, r10, #PROCINFO_INITFUNC
ENDPROC(stext)
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
ENTRY(secondary_startup)
/*
*
Common entry point for secondary CPUs.
*
* Ensure that we're
in SVC mode, and IRQs are disabled. Lookup
* the processor type -
there is no need to check the machine type
* as it has already been
validated by the primary processor.
*/
msr cpsr_c, #PSR_F_BIT |
PSR_I_BIT | SVC_MODE
mrc p15, 0, r9, c0, c0 @ get processor id
bl __lookup_processor_type
movs r10,
r5 @ invalid processor?
moveq r0, #'p' @ yes, error 'p'
beq __error
/*
* Use the page tables supplied from __cpu_up.
*/
adr r4,
__secondary_data
ldmia r4, {r5, r7, r13} @ address to jump to
after
sub r4, r4, r5 @ mmu has been enabled
ldr r4, [r7,
r4] @ get secondary_data.pgdir
adr lr, __enable_mmu @ return
address
add pc, r10, #PROCINFO_INITFUNC @ initialise processor
@
(return control reg)
ENDPROC(secondary_startup)
/*
* r6 = &secondary_data
*/
ENTRY(__secondary_switched)
ldr sp,
[r7, #4] @ get secondary_data.stack
mov fp, #0
b secondary_start_kernel
ENDPROC(__secondary_switched)
.type __secondary_data, %object
__secondary_data:
.long .
.long secondary_data
.long __secondary_switched
#endif
/* defined(CONFIG_SMP) */
/*
* Setup common bits before finally enabling the MMU.
Essentially
* this is just loading the page table pointer and domain
access
* registers.
*/
__enable_mmu:
#ifdef
CONFIG_ALIGNMENT_TRAP
orr r0, r0, #CR_A
#else
bic r0, r0,
#CR_A
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_DISABLE
bic r0, r0,
#CR_C
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_BPREDICT_DISABLE
bic r0, r0,
#CR_Z
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_ICACHE_DISABLE
bic r0, r0,
#CR_I
#endif
mov r5, #(domain_val(DOMAIN_USER, DOMAIN_MANAGER) | \
domain_val(DOMAIN_KERNEL, DOMAIN_MANAGER) | \
domain_val(DOMAIN_TABLE, DOMAIN_MANAGER) | \
domain_val(DOMAIN_IO, DOMAIN_CLIENT))
mcr p15, 0, r5, c3, c0, 0 @
load domain access register
mcr p15, 0, r4, c2, c0, 0 @ load page
table pointer
b __turn_mmu_on
ENDPROC(__enable_mmu)
/*
* Enable the MMU. This completely changes the structure of
the visible
* memory space. You will not be able to trace execution
through this.
* If you have an enquiry about this, *please* check
the linux-arm-kernel
* mailing list archives BEFORE sending another
post to the list.
*
* r0 = cp#15 control register
* r13 =
*virtual* address to jump to upon completion
*
* other
registers depend on the function called upon completion
*/
.align 5
__turn_mmu_on:
mov r0,
r0
mcr p15, 0, r0, c1, c0, 0 @ write control reg
mrc p15, 0,
r3, c0, c0, 0 @ read id reg
mov r3, r3
mov r3, r3
mov pc,
r13
ENDPROC(__turn_mmu_on)
#include "head-common.S"
----------------------------------------------------------------
可
能大家注意到,,上面有大段的文字是secondary_startup以及CONFIG_SMP等,,其實(shí)這個(gè)是對于SMP系統(tǒng)才會(huì)采用的代碼。眾所周
知,,SMP是對
稱多處理的簡稱,,是指系統(tǒng)中使用了一組處理器,,各CPU之間共享內(nèi)存子系統(tǒng)和總線結(jié)構(gòu),對應(yīng)的有非對稱多處理,,嵌入式設(shè)備上我們并不會(huì)使用到
SMP的功能,。
乍一看,無論如何也調(diào)用不到網(wǎng)上所謂的start_kernel函數(shù)中,,大家注意看“ldr r13,
__switch_data”,這里就是將函數(shù)__switch_data的
地址保存到r13,,并在函數(shù)__enable_mmu-->__turn_mmu_on結(jié)束位置的“mov pc,
r13”中將__switch_data調(diào)用起來,。而函數(shù)__switch_data是實(shí)
現(xiàn)在\arch\${arch}\kernel\head-common.S中的一個(gè)函數(shù),而函數(shù)start_kernel就是由
__switch_data調(diào)用起來的,。
你一定在奇怪,,那么函數(shù)__enable_mmu是怎么調(diào)用起來的呢,呵呵,,你簡直是太聰明,、太細(xì)心
了。那趕緊聽我跟你說吧,,代碼“add pc,
r10,
#PROCINFO_INITFUNC”將會(huì)跳轉(zhuǎn)到\arch\${arch}\mm\proc-arn-926.S中的初始化函數(shù)
__arm926_setup中,,并在該函數(shù)結(jié)束的位置以“mov pc,
lr”的方式調(diào)用__enable_mmu,千萬別告訴我你忘記了前面提到的__enable_mmu的值保存在lr中哦,。
至于為什么代
碼“add pc, r10,
#PROCINFO_INITFUNC”將會(huì)跳轉(zhuǎn)到\arch\${arch}\mm\proc-arn-926.S中的初始化函數(shù)
__arm926_setup
中,,我這里就不列舉了??梢詤⒄蘸竺嫖肄D(zhuǎn)載的一篇文章,。
----------------------------------------------------------------
.type __arm926_setup,
#function
__arm926_setup:
mov r0, #0
mcr p15, 0, r0, c7,
c7 @ invalidate I,D caches on v4
mcr p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4 @
drain write buffer on v4
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
mcr p15, 0, r0, c8,
c7 @ invalidate I,D TLBs on v4
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_DCACHE_WRITETHROUGH
mov r0, #4 @ disable
write-back on caches explicitly
mcr p15, 7, r0, c15, c0, 0
#endif
adr r5, arm926_crval
ldmia r5, {r5, r6}
mrc p15, 0, r0, c1,
c0 @ get control register v4
bic r0, r0, r5
orr r0, r0, r6
#ifdef
CONFIG_CPU_CACHE_ROUND_ROBIN
orr r0, r0, #0x4000 @ .1.. .... ....
....
#endif
mov pc, lr
----------------------------------------------------------------
好
了,終于調(diào)用到start_kernel了,這是任何版本的linux內(nèi)核通用的初始化函數(shù),。
3. Linux系統(tǒng)初始化
前面已經(jīng)提到,,函數(shù)start_kernel是任何版本的linux內(nèi)核通用的初始化函數(shù),也是匯編代碼執(zhí)行結(jié)束后的第一個(gè)c函數(shù),,它實(shí)現(xiàn)在
init/main.c中,。
有關(guān)start_kernel的代碼很長,初始化了很多東西,,比如調(diào)用了setup_arch(),、
timer_init()、init_IRQ,、console_init(),、
pgtable_cache_init()、security_init()、signals_init()和rest_init()等,,這里只對
rest_init()做簡單的分析,。
下面首先列寫一下rest_init()的代碼:
----------------------------------------------------------------
/*
*
We need to finalize in a non-__init function or else race conditions
*
between the root thread and the init thread may cause start_kernel to
*
be reaped by free_initmem before the root thread has proceeded to
*
cpu_idle.
*
* gcc-3.4 accidentally inlines this function, so
use noinline.
*/
static noinline void __init_refok rest_init(void)
__releases(kernel_lock)
{
int
pid;
kernel_thread(kernel_init, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_SIGHAND);
numa_default_policy();
pid
= kernel_thread(kthreadd, NULL, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES);
kthreadd_task
= find_task_by_pid_ns(pid, &init_pid_ns);
unlock_kernel();
/*
* The boot idle thread must execute schedule()
* at
least once to get things moving:
*/
init_idle_bootup_task(current);
rcu_scheduler_starting();
preempt_enable_no_resched();
schedule();
preempt_disable();
/* Call into cpu_idle with preempt disabled */
cpu_idle();
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
可
以看到,函數(shù)rest_init()首先會(huì)去創(chuàng)建線程kernel_init(注意:這里和網(wǎng)上或者相關(guān)書籍中描述的也不一樣,,可能是Linux版本的問
題)
,,有些文檔中描述這里創(chuàng)建的是Init線程,雖然名字不一致,,但是具體的實(shí)現(xiàn)是基本一致的,,基本上都是完成根文件系統(tǒng)的掛載、初始化所有Linux
的
設(shè)備驅(qū)動(dòng)(就是調(diào)用驅(qū)動(dòng)的初始化函數(shù),,類似于CE/Mobile中的Device
Manager對設(shè)備驅(qū)動(dòng)的初始化)以及啟動(dòng)用戶空間Init進(jìn)程,。
由于手中的rest_init進(jìn)程和網(wǎng)上描述的都是不一致的,所以這里也進(jìn)
行了簡要的列舉,,代碼如下:
----------------------------------------------------------------
static
int __init kernel_init(void * unused)
{
lock_kernel();
/*
* init can run on any cpu.
*/
set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current,
CPU_MASK_ALL_PTR);
/*
* Tell the world that we're going to be
the grim
* reaper of innocent orphaned children.
*
* We
don't want people to have to make incorrect
* assumptions about
where in the task array this
* can be found.
*/
init_pid_ns.child_reaper
= current;
cad_pid = task_pid(current);
smp_prepare_cpus(setup_max_cpus);
do_pre_smp_initcalls();
start_boot_trace();
smp_init();
sched_init_smp();
cpuset_init_smp();
do_basic_setup();
/*
* check if there is an early userspace init. If yes, let it
do all
* the work
*/
if (!ramdisk_execute_command)
ramdisk_execute_command =
"/init";
if (sys_access((const char __user *) ramdisk_execute_command, 0) !=
0) {
ramdisk_execute_command = NULL;
prepare_namespace();
}
/*
* Ok, we have completed the initial bootup, and
* we're
essentially up and running. Get rid of the
* initmem segments and
start the user-mode stuff..
*/
init_post();
return 0;
}
static noinline int init_post(void)
{
/* need to finish all
async __init code before freeing the memory */
async_synchronize_full();
free_initmem();
unlock_kernel();
mark_rodata_ro();
system_state
= SYSTEM_RUNNING;
numa_default_policy();
if (sys_open((const char __user *) "/dev/console", O_RDWR, 0) <
0)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: unable to open an initial
console.\n");
(void) sys_dup(0);
(void) sys_dup(0);
current->signal->flags |= SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE;
if (ramdisk_execute_command) {
run_init_process(ramdisk_execute_command);
printk(KERN_WARNING
"Failed to execute %s\n",
ramdisk_execute_command);
}
/*
* We try each of these until one succeeds.
*
* The
Bourne shell can be used instead of init if we are
* trying to
recover a really broken machine.
*/
if (execute_command) {
run_init_process(execute_command);
printk(KERN_WARNING
"Failed to execute %s. Attempting "
"defaults...\n",
execute_command);
}
run_init_process("/sbin/init");
run_init_process("/etc/init");
run_init_process("/bin/init");
run_init_process("/bin/sh");
panic("No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel.");
}
----------------------------------------------------------------
可
以看到,,和網(wǎng)絡(luò)上相關(guān)的描述不一樣的是,這里首先會(huì)去初始化設(shè)備驅(qū)動(dòng),,而不是像網(wǎng)上或者數(shù)據(jù)上所描述的一樣,,首先去加載跟文件系
統(tǒng),難道不存在初始化的時(shí)候需要訪問文件的驅(qū)動(dòng)了,?或者以前的做法純屬一種安全的考慮,?
這些問題就留到以后對
Linux&Android有深入地了解之后再去考慮吧!