英語晨讀 · 山東省立醫(yī)院疼痛科英語晨讀已經(jīng)堅持10余年的時間了,,每天交班前15分鐘都會精選一篇英文文獻進行閱讀和翻譯,。一是可以保持工作后的英語閱讀習慣,,二是可以學習前沿的疼痛相關(guān)知識,。我們會將晨讀內(nèi)容與大家分享,助力疼痛學習,。 本次文獻選自Pan M , Li Q , Li S , et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy: Indications and Complications[J]. Pain physician, 2020, 23(1):49-56. Conclusions and Outlook As a minimally invasive surgery, PELD is superior to conventional open surgery due to its shorter operation time, lower bleeding volume, minimal soft tissue damage, and faster return to work. However, it also has several disadvantages. First, surgeons are required to be very skilled in spine surgery. Incidence of complications or revisions for beginners could be high owing to the shortage of experience and proficiency, which results in a sheer learning curve. Second, although local anesthesia applied in PELD helps protect nerve roots from damage, side effects could be greater with PELD compared to other procedures conducted by general anesthesia when patients cannot tolerate intraoperative pain. Severe painful feelings may even cause a deadly cardiovascular accident. Finally, frequent fluoroscopy is needed to obtain a correct puncture route, so radiation exposure to medical staff and patients is inevitable. 結(jié)論與展望 與傳統(tǒng)的開放手術(shù)相比,,PELD作為一種微創(chuàng)手術(shù)具有手術(shù)時間短、出血量小,、軟組織損傷小,、恢復快等優(yōu)點。不過,,它也存在一些缺點,。首先,PELD要求手術(shù)者在脊柱外科方面有非常嫻熟的技巧。由于缺乏經(jīng)驗和嫻熟的技巧,,初學者的并發(fā)癥或翻修手術(shù)的發(fā)生率可能很高,,這導致PELD的學習曲線陡峭。第二,,盡管應(yīng)用局部麻醉有助于避免神經(jīng)根損傷,,但是PELD的副作用可能比其他患者因不能忍受術(shù)中疼痛而采用全身麻醉的手術(shù)更大。嚴重的疼痛感甚至可導致致命的心血管意外,。最后,,PELD需要頻繁的透視以獲得正確的穿刺路徑,因此對醫(yī)務(wù)人員和患者的輻射暴露是不可避免的,。 In terms of different surgery techniques, PETD and PEID each have their unique indications and complications. As we mentioned previously, PETD is more suitable in cases of L4/5 or the upper index. The PETD technique is also an appropriate treatment for lateral stenosis and foraminal stenosis. However, PETD has difficulty in dealing with highly migrated disc herniation, and in this situation incomplete removal of herniated disc fragments occurs. Improper location and puncturing in PETD can lead to injury of lumbar arteries and exiting nerve roots. Therefore, postoperative dysesthesia and hematoma are more common in PETD. On the other hand, PEID has advantages in L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation, central lumbar stenosis, and highly migrated disc herniation due to the great intervertebral space of the L5/S1 segment. However, excessive stretch in PEID can injure the thecal sac, so the risk of dural tear is higher than in PETD . In addition, local anesthesia is not applicable to PEID because of its relatively poor analgesic effect, which heightens the risks of anesthesia for elderly patients. 就不同的手術(shù)技術(shù)而言,,PETD和PEID各有其獨特的適應(yīng)證和并發(fā)癥。如前所述,,PETD更適合于L4/5或上間隙的病變,。PETD技術(shù)也是治療側(cè)隱窩狹窄和椎間孔狹窄的合適方法。然而,,PETD很難處理高度移位的椎間盤突出,,在這種情況下,容易發(fā)生突出的椎間盤摘除不徹底,。PETD定位和穿刺不當可導致腰動脈和出孔根損傷,。因此,術(shù)后感覺障礙和血腫在PETD中更為常見,。另一方面,,由于L5/S1節(jié)段椎板間隙較大,PEID在L5/S1腰椎間盤突出癥,、中央型腰椎管狹窄癥以及高度移位的腰椎間盤突出癥中具有優(yōu)勢,。然而,PEID術(shù)中因過度拉伸有可能損傷硬膜囊,,因此硬膜撕裂的風險高于PETD,。另外,因為局部麻醉鎮(zhèn)痛效果相對較差而不適用于PEID,,這就增加了老年患者的麻醉風險,。 |
|
來自: 新用戶1882ga2h > 《待分類》