本公眾號每天分享一篇最新一期Anesthesia & Analgesia等SCI雜志的摘要翻譯,敬請關(guān)注并提出寶貴意見 Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction 背景與目的 實驗和臨床證據(jù)支持炎癥在動脈粥樣硬化及其并發(fā)癥中具有一定作用,。秋水仙堿是一種口服的強效抗炎藥物,,用于治療痛風(fēng)和心包炎。有研究發(fā)現(xiàn),,口服小劑量秋水仙堿治療穩(wěn)定型冠心病的患者發(fā)生心血管意外事件比不服用秋水仙堿的患者少,。由于急性冠狀動脈綜合征與炎癥加劇密切相關(guān),因此,,本研究旨在評估秋水仙堿對心血管結(jié)局的影響,,以及對近期發(fā)生心肌梗死患者的長期安全性。 方 法 我們收集了心肌梗死后30天內(nèi)的患者并進行了隨機,、雙盲試驗,。這些患者被隨機分配為口服小劑量秋水仙堿(0.5mg,每天一次)或口服安慰劑,。主要治療結(jié)局是由心血管疾病引起的死亡,、心肺復(fù)蘇、心肌梗死,、卒中或心絞痛緊急住院施行冠狀動脈血管重建術(shù),。并對主要結(jié)局和安全性進行了綜合評估。 結(jié) 果 本研究共納入4745名患者,;其中,,2366名患者被分配到秋水仙堿組,2379名患者被分配到安慰劑組,?;颊唠S訪時間中位數(shù)為22.6個月,。與安慰劑組患者7.1%的主要結(jié)局發(fā)生率相比,秋水仙堿組患者主要結(jié)局發(fā)生率為5.5%(風(fēng)險比0.77,;95% CI 0.61~0.96,;P=0.02)。心血管原因所致死亡的風(fēng)險比為0.84(95%CI 0.46~1.52),,心肺復(fù)蘇的風(fēng)險比為0.83(95%CI0.25~2.73),,心肌梗死的風(fēng)險比為0.91 (95%CI0.68~1.21),卒中的風(fēng)險比為0.26(95%CI 0.10~0.70),,因心絞痛緊急住院施行冠狀動脈重建術(shù)治療的風(fēng)險比為0.50(95%CI 0.31~0.81),。秋水仙堿組有9.7%的患者出現(xiàn)腹瀉,安慰劑組有8.9%的患者出現(xiàn)腹瀉(P=0.35),。秋水仙堿組有0.9%的患者出現(xiàn)肺炎等嚴重不良反應(yīng),,安慰劑組有0.4%(P=0.03)。 結(jié) 論 在近期發(fā)生心肌梗死的患者中,,與安慰劑相比,,每日口服秋水仙堿0.5 mg明顯降低了缺血性心血管事件的發(fā)生風(fēng)險。 原始文獻摘要 Tardif JC, Kouz S, Waters DD, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarction.[J]. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1912388. BACKGROUND Experimental and clinical evidence support the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis and its complications. Colchicine is an orally administered, potent antiinflammatory medication that is indicated for the treatment of gout and pericarditis. METHODS We performed a randomized, double-blind trial involving patients recruited within 30 days after a myocardial infarction. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, resuscitated cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, stroke, or urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. The components of the primary end point and safety were also assessed. RESULTS A total of 4745 patients were enrolled; 2366 patients were assigned to the colchicine group, and 2379 to the placebo group. Patients were followed for a median of 22.6 months. The primary end point occurred in 5.5% of the patients in the colchicine group, as compared with 7.1% of those in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 0.96; P=0.02). The hazard ratios were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.46 to 1.52) for death from cardiovascular causes, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.25 to 2.73) for resuscitated cardiac arrest, 0.91 (95% CI, 0.68 to 1.21) for myocardial infarction, 0.26 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.70) for stroke, and 0.50 (95% CI, 0.31 to 0.81) for urgent hospitalization for angina leading to coronary revascularization. Diarrhea was reported in 9.7% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 8.9% of those in the placebo group (P=0.35). Pneumonia was reported as a serious adverse event in 0.9% of the patients in the colchicine group and in 0.4% of those in the placebo group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with a recent myocardial infarction, colchicine at a dose of 0.5 mg daily led to a significantly lower risk of ischemic cardiovascular events than placebo. 麻醉學(xué)文獻進展分享 貴州醫(yī)科大學(xué)高鴻教授課題組 翻譯:馮玉蓉 編輯:馮玉蓉 審校:王貴龍 |
|
來自: 罌粟花anesthGH > 《待分類》