分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)營養(yǎng)與代謝

      隨著科技發(fā)展,、生活水準(zhǔn)提升,，許多文明病也應(yīng)運而生。新世紀(jì)以來,，各種慢性病肆虐全球,，愈演愈烈，甚至超過“突飛猛進(jìn)”的醫(yī)學(xué)所能追趕的程度,，不僅患者受苦,，也造成嚴(yán)重的社會問題,。

      根本問題在細(xì)胞營養(yǎng)與代謝

      美國參議院首先重視這個現(xiàn)象，于一九七五年成立了一個“營養(yǎng)問題特別委員會”,，集合美國人類生物科學(xué)各種領(lǐng)域的精英共同徹底的調(diào)查,、探討，題目為：“營養(yǎng)與人類所必要的物質(zhì)”,，其范圍幾乎涵蓋全世界的營養(yǎng)問題,。經(jīng)過二年研究調(diào)查，該委員會發(fā)表長達(dá)五千頁以上的報告書,，震撼了全美國及國際醫(yī)藥,、營養(yǎng)學(xué)界。

      報告書寫道：現(xiàn)代慢性病其實就是（細(xì)胞）代謝異常的疾病,，是起因于營養(yǎng)的代謝失衡,。對于此種失衡，不能用應(yīng)付細(xì)菌的方法治療,，因為它是身體本身質(zhì)變引起的疾病,。從前的營養(yǎng)問題主要是熱量不足，現(xiàn)在的疾病問題則完全在于營養(yǎng)不均或不良,。從前的醫(yī)學(xué)完全忽視了膳食與疾病的關(guān)連,，此種對根本問題的忽視，可說是只有一雙眼睛的醫(yī)學(xué),。

      例如在美國醫(yī)學(xué)院,，只有4%把營養(yǎng)課程當(dāng)做必修科目；高達(dá)百分之二十五至百分之五十的醫(yī)院,，供應(yīng)住院病人的飲食在營養(yǎng)學(xué)上是錯誤的,，因此疾病沒有治好或延遲治愈的例子很多,。因為20世紀(jì)特有的,、偏頗的思考路線支配了醫(yī)學(xué)界，此種“擊退細(xì)菌”的醫(yī)學(xué)觀念,，只會產(chǎn)生出不具有營養(yǎng)知識的醫(yī)師,。遺憾的是，醫(yī)界不僅沒有發(fā)覺到其片面性,，還以為那就是非常進(jìn)步的近代醫(yī)學(xué),，以致往往只掌握了疾病的半面。未來顯然要考慮到“細(xì)胞”的“營養(yǎng)”及“代謝”問題,，才是人類的最新醫(yī)學(xué),。

      所謂“分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)”，是以人類“身”與“心”的健康為總體營造主體,，旁及人類生物學(xué)各種相關(guān)科學(xué),，如臨床醫(yī)學(xué)、免疫學(xué),、遺傳學(xué),、分子生物學(xué)、生物醫(yī)學(xué),、生物能量醫(yī)學(xué),、量子物理學(xué)、高分子生物學(xué),、生化學(xué),、電子工學(xué)、心理學(xué),、超心理學(xué)等,，加以綜合研究，以徹底了解構(gòu)成人體細(xì)胞的“分子”狀態(tài),、遺傳基因及細(xì)胞活動,，從而分析人體基本需求的四大物質(zhì)元素：營養(yǎng)、心靈,、氧氣及水,，了解彼此的互動及相輔相成關(guān)系,，而加以適當(dāng)?shù)慕M配、安排,、充分的供給人類使用,，使人體內(nèi)擁有健全、恒常的生態(tài)鏈,，促使細(xì)胞分子正常,、代謝順暢，血液組織與循環(huán)良好,，潛在意識及情緒安定,，因而形成自然治愈力，有人稱之為“營養(yǎng)素醫(yī)學(xué)療法”（NutrionTherapy）,，實際上稱為“分子矯正療法”,。生物學(xué)家已經(jīng)證實，所有生命幾乎就是細(xì)胞“分子”活動的問題,，可以說“分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)”是二十一世紀(jì)醫(yī)學(xué)的主流,，更是現(xiàn)代文明病的最后終結(jié)者。

      分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)的定義為“就是充分供應(yīng)存在于人體內(nèi)的細(xì)胞,，在進(jìn)行正常代謝作用時所需要的必須營養(yǎng)素和氧氣,，進(jìn)一步使意識超于安定，使身心平衡,，借此增加自然治愈力來防治疾病的一種醫(yī)學(xué),。簡單的說就是”為了人類能有健康生活，而范圍廣泛的科學(xué),，雖有醫(yī)學(xué)這個名稱,，但并不像原有醫(yī)學(xué)那樣，只研究有關(guān)人體的部分,，范圍并不是那樣的狹窄,。因此,，從這種角度來看,，把它歸納為醫(yī)學(xué)中其實也并不很恰當(dāng)。

      醫(yī)學(xué)可分臨床醫(yī)學(xué)與基礎(chǔ)醫(yī)學(xué),，當(dāng)然也有化學(xué),、營養(yǎng)學(xué)、如果不包括地質(zhì)學(xué)及宇宙科學(xué)等,，是無法成為真正分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)的,。

      分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)所包括的科學(xué)有：

臨床醫(yī)學(xué),、基礎(chǔ)醫(yī)學(xué)、生物學(xué),、分子生物學(xué),、藥學(xué)、營養(yǎng)學(xué),、遺傳學(xué)……等都與身體有關(guān)連,。

化學(xué)…………………………………………………………與代謝有關(guān)

物理學(xué)………………………………………………與力學(xué)、構(gòu)造有關(guān)

量子物理學(xué)…………………………………………為構(gòu)成細(xì)胞的物質(zhì)

心理學(xué),、超心理學(xué)…………………………………………身,、心一體

電子工程……………………………………身體和電氣或離子有關(guān)連

地質(zhì)學(xué)、農(nóng)學(xué)……………………………………………應(yīng)吃那些食物

民俗,、歷史,、人文……………………………………環(huán)境與健康有關(guān)

考古學(xué)、人類學(xué)……………………………………………人從何而來

社會學(xué)……………………………………………集體（團(tuán)體）的形成

經(jīng)濟(jì),、經(jīng)營學(xué)…………………………………………收入和日常生活

宗教,、哲學(xué)………………………………………………與精神的關(guān)連

公害學(xué)…………………………………………對健康不良影響的食物

      由于分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)包含了以上一切有關(guān)連的科學(xué)，因此也不可以稱作“綜合科學(xué)的精華”,。然而,，近代醫(yī)學(xué)還未能打破只研究人體，尤其是癥狀方面的框框,，因此雖然名為某某醫(yī)學(xué)家,，卻不見得都有分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)方面的知識。甚至有些醫(yī)師根本不了解電氣（離子）,，也不懂得什么是氧氣（物理,、化學(xué)）等；而以為外科和精神科完全無關(guān)的人更是不勝枚舉,。但是,，如果真想擁有健康幸福的人生，則務(wù)必具備有關(guān)這些科學(xué)的一切知識,。

編輯

分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)所以需要醫(yī)學(xué)以外不同領(lǐng)域的知識,，理由在探究代謝異常的原因時，少不了其他各方面的知識,。

說到此處,，大家想畢已了解對癥療法，其實便是靠“手術(shù)和藥物”消除病患眼前的痛苦和癥狀,。事實上,，疾病或癥狀都是先有了原因，而后才發(fā)出信號,，因此在進(jìn)行治療進(jìn),，務(wù)必找出信號的來源,。而為了能找出病因，除了目前的現(xiàn)象（癥狀）外,，對于表面上未顯現(xiàn)的事物也不可忽略,。換言之，分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)的起點是在找尋代謝異常的因素,，為了達(dá)成這個目的,，當(dāng)然就需要多方面的知識。譬如有機水銀如聚積在體內(nèi)時,，會造成高血壓癥,，如果缺乏這方面的知識，又如何進(jìn)行尋找原因的工作呢,？

近代醫(yī)學(xué)所以始終停滯在對癥療法的范圍,，便是由于缺乏這些關(guān)連性的科學(xué)知識，以致無法探究原因,，向前邁進(jìn),；另一方面，由于權(quán)威主義的作祟,，在傳統(tǒng)的窠中封閉自己,、排斥他人的思想，更是進(jìn)入原因療法的絆腳石,，是值得深思反省的,。

現(xiàn)代醫(yī)學(xué)與分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)的比較

以何為標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

治療的方法

治療的根據(jù)

對營養(yǎng)方面

對人類方面

治療的開始

對氧氣方面

生病的原因

近代醫(yī)學(xué)

器官

藥物、手術(shù)

從表面

熱量

物質(zhì)的

發(fā)病后

不重視

器質(zhì)性的變性,、細(xì)菌性,、多了什么東西

分子矯正醫(yī)學(xué)

細(xì)胞分子

營養(yǎng)素、氧氣

從內(nèi)部（自然治療法）

代謝營養(yǎng)素

精神的

發(fā)病前的預(yù)防

重視

機能性的變性,、代謝性,、缺乏了某種東西

健 康的公式

營養(yǎng)素→血液→細(xì)胞→身體健康

氧氣

//baike.baidu.com/link?url=rUtIhpTCknlh38RCoLh-5Lgw3upB-x_b99gjhPPR5XH3r8G2TAuorrJs1x7jAqL7mIIMAlkRfDU2t7m9lWgHi_

Review of The Orthomolecular Treatmentof Chronic Disease,

 from the Journal ofOrthomolecular Medicine:

Just as it seems the whole the world is moving to e-books andsoundbites of the internet, Andrew Saul, true to his contrarianways, saw it as necessary to bring to the world this weighty800-page reference work, The Orthomolecular Treatment of ChronicDisease.

Follow his thinking and you'll discover some great reasons why youneed this book in your practice. Despite the hundreds of books onthe subject, Saul perceived that there is a blind spot: namely,there was no adequate showcase for the longest continuouslypublished orthomolecular resource in the world: The Journal ofOrthomolecular Medicine. This book aims to correct that with awell thought out compilation of 46 years of Journal paperson both theory and practice, the historical personages andpioneers, and innovative therapies for chronic conditions asdiscovered by the many orthomolecular healers who contributed overthe years.

The book is divided into three major parts. Part One details thefoundations of orthomolecular therapy and the science behind it. Inthis section Saul states that progress in orthomolecular medicinecan be divided into two classes: major, paradigm-shiftingdiscoveries and the many smaller advances which build and expandthe applicability of the pioneers' overall vision. This process haschurned along for a half-century and, as Saul explains, it beganwith a long, quiet incubation period, until a critical mass ofconsciousness change took place, and the advances progressedrapidly. This ascent is the exciting age in which we now live, andso, Part One charts some of the major and minor innovations andprinciples in a selection of 20 Journal papers. Foundationalpapers, for example, would include the theoretical paperOrthomolecular Psychiatry by Linus Pauling, along with FrederickKlenner's practical Observations on the Dose and Administration ofAscorbic Acid When Employed Beyond the Range of a Vitamin in HumanPathology.

Fleshing out this overview are papers which expand the main ideasinto specific areas such as cancer and pediatric psychiatry. Wiselyincluded are specific articles on what we might call the "vitaminwars:" the politics of orthomolecular vs. conventional medicine(i.e. safe upper limits of nutrients; research methods; thelimitations of drugs and dangers of iatrogenic disease). Throughthese battles, we gain an appreciation of how even the best ideasget waylaid out of fear and prejudice. Throughout this section Saulexcerpts pertinent commentary from his own JOM writings toconnect the dots into a coherent whole

Part II, Pioneers of Orthomolecular Medicine, show us some of thelively personalities that created this movement in medicine. Whenwe consider that most vitamins were discovered within the last 80years, we are young; many of the main figures today represent justthe second generation after the originators from the last century.With so small a pantheon, nothing can familiarize ourselves betterthan Orthomolecular Medicine's Annual Hall of Fame Awards whichtake place at our yearly conferences. In this evening a handful ofpioneers are celebrated and presented with a multimedia biographyof their life's work. Saul here gathers the biographies of 56pioneers and advocates, some passed on but many who are still withus. The value of this section is that the OM Hall of Fame is aboutthe only place you're likely to hear of the existence of many ofthese quiet geniuses, some of whose work is locked away in paperarchives and forgotten, despite their tremendous contribution andpromise to our sick age.

Part III brings the best of JOM's knowledge base to bear onspecific chronic diseases such as alcoholism, cancer, depression,schizophrenia and pediatric mental health. Not intended to be anexhaustive list, it samples what is possible, with a selection ofdisease categories drawn from the classic papers of contributingauthors and experts. Instead of searching through the decades ofjournals, Saul has helpfully selected his estimation of our"greatest hits" for common chronic diseases. In the case of cancerthere are clinical papers from Abram Hoffer, Hugh Riordan, MichaelSchachter and Linus Pauling. Likewise in schizophrenia areinvaluable works by Abram Hoffer, Humphrey Osmond and JonathanProusky. These sections are rich in case histories, physicianobservation, successes, setbacks, and practicalities. What becomesclear here is that chronic disease is where orthomolecular therapyshines; unfortunately it's the one thing that our taxed health caresystem is ill equipped to explore and adopt.

Saul also includes some valuable appendices which includeimmuno-boosting IV vitamin C protocols of Frederick Klenner,Vitamin C anticancer therapies at the Riordan clinic and radiationinjury treatment protocols of Atsuo Yanagisawa. They form atestament to the power of the optimum dose.

The Orthomolecular Treatment of Chronic Disease succeeds very wellin bringing together over 45 years of published research from theJournal of Orthomolecular Medicine. More than anencyclopedia, it's a self-contained education on the history,personalities and major discoveries all wrapped up withapplications to specific diseases. Large as it is, it's imminentlymore practical than 45 years of brittle journals on a groaningbookshelf. It's one of the best synopses of our venerableJOM as you'll ever see.

原文網(wǎng)址//www.doctoryourself.com/treatmentreviews.html